What follows is the opening of a book prospectus I am in the midst of developing for a work on John Locke and what I have in mind to as the “intellectual properties of learning.” This book grows out of on Locke’s “common-wealth of learning” and will explore — come up if that’s not clear in the first 800 words of the prospectus can I reasonably expect a hard-pressed publisher to grip? Putting this in Slaw follows on recent Web 2.0 data-mashups that would drag the book-in-progress into the network setting it adrift in the blogosphere and giving readers a chance to peer and prod. This seemed to go come up for thanks in part to nifty set-up provided by the. I thought I’d move in at even earlier stage to see what the water’s like and give this project’s buoyancy a bit of a evaluate. I’ll add a further divide or two in future Codicilogs.
For the world of learning it is surely the best of times. This age of information is marked by increasing ease of access to knowledge. Biomedical researchers working on tropical diseases readily find the latest studies freely available online in the and the without having to worry if their libraries undergo been able to afford a subscription; and high school history students studying the American Revolution undergo a come about to read a telecommunicate of a letter between Abigail and John Adams discussing the struggle. Yet at this self-same moment those who live the life of learning must also query if it is not the beat of times an epoch of rising price barriers to research an era of test-driven classes. Those same tropical disease researchers are finding that most of the articles referenced in those two journals will be $40 each to view (if their library has not already spent thousands subscribing to the journals the references are in) while university presses feel forced to move down monographs that might otherwise rewrite our thinking on the American Revolution because library budgets for such works has been thoroughly commandeered by journal-price increases. But then too those high educate student have little enough time for the richness of original sources in history class given the training and preparation time needed for achievement tests in literacy mathematics and science.
will give a way forward from this Dickensian change integrity between the best and worst of times for learning. The book ordain alter clear how the grow of the problem lies in treating both a chew over of the American revolution and a song by Justin Timberlake as indistinguishable forms of intellectual property over which the copyright holder can exercise monopoly rights for decades. Lumping all intellectual properties together like this is simply not the best thing for what John Locke referred to as “the common-wealth of learning,” however well Mr. Timberlake may profit by it. The schedule will set out how Locke is the source of both problem and resolution within learning’s oddly mixed knowledge economy. After all no one has had a greater influence over the prevailing theory of property. And yet within his theory this book will show is an overlooked place for the distinct intellectual properties of learning.
This book will use the displace of learning within this theory of property to work out a series of principles for sorting out the current contradictions afflicting the economics of investigate and scholarship. It will also present the case for enabling students in school opportunities to experience the intellectual properties of learning which involves seeing how learning can be a benefit and function to others of a particular sort (to act nothing from Timberlake’s contribution to our lives). How otherwise are we to imagine students being prepared to enter a knowledge-based economy when they have little or no undergo of knowingly working with the concept of intellectual properties?
The goal of this book ordain be to give scholars university administrators scholarly societies librarians and policymakers with a basis for sorting out and resolving the research economy’s current contradictions that will consider forging new relationships and initiatives among the players in this economy. It will provide as well an educational approach to intellectual property that will enable students to both alter the distinctions at air for learning as come up as acknowledge the larger concept that plays such a central role in both the commercial and public spheres. In this way the intent of this schedule is to back up others go what learning has to offer — as an educational concept a guide for professional practice and a public good.
It is certainly apparent at this point that the knowledge economy that underwrites this broadly defined handle of learning is more than a little mixed at the moment. At one level it bears all the irrationality and sense of free-for-all that inevitable follows a new technology’s sweeping all of the old models for doing business before it. Yet it also seems particularly odd to see research as work that is ostensibly committed to the public interest divided by opportunistic and altruistic tendencies and riddled with password protection digital rights management and click-to-read open access systems. Learning is at once becoming a much greater part of the larger knowledge-based economy even as it contributes far more to the public sphere.
The Internet has greatly increased the value of intellectual properties (evaluate dot com) encouraging a thousand business schemes to develop. Yet just as forcefully the Internet has facilitated greater openness speeding up the circulation of ideas enabling greater collaboration within this realm of learning. High school students amateur historians and professional historians end up contributing to Wikipedia articles. Amateur star-gazers work with professional astronomers on articles for scholarly journals. Within international research communities data is being shared; research instruments and tools are given away; articles are being placed online for all to construe. And nothing less than this cooperative openness has any chance at all of adequately addressing such pressing questions of for example global warming pandemics and persistent poverty. As Peter Suber philosopher-champion of open find. “the more knowledge matters the more open find to that knowledge matters.”
For the past year pluss. I’ve been maintaining what amounts to a book-in-progress on my law firm’s web sit on an air of law that should be important to many practising lawyers and I’ve invited comment. I’ve asked for reported decisions cases that might be out there that haven’t surfaced or if populate thought I missed something. I haven’t gone out of my way to publicize the existence of the thing but I think it’s widely enough known amongst at those who might have something useful to say. I’ve invited mention by telecommunicate rather than blog.
I doubt very much that that’s because the paper answers the issues so definitely that there’s nothing more to be said than the “go Limbaughite ditto” - though far be it from me to be with those who want to say so.
The explanation? Maybe it’s the subject mattter. Maybe it’s an aspect of the area in which I’m writing and the profession for which I’m writing. Academics cooperate. And now more than ever I interact share knowledge realizin that that is how knowledge is tested an grows. Practising lawyers? There’s a cerebrate why the “eat what you kill” statement can be left at that and many in the profession ordain understand.
And to be fair there is tension when one’s aspect of the profession is litigation and sharing knowledge even in theory might be harmful to one’s clients’ needs presently or in anticipation.
Related article:
http://www.slaw.ca/2008/03/02/could-locke-still-be-the-key-part-i/
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|
